Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$PCLNX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- evsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fftfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin Federal Limited-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class A1
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhkdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2030 Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fjtkx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® 2045 Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- ftec
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Expenses: 0.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- fthsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gaosx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gbosx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ggsax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gmf
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- apgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- bldix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock Managed Income Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dem
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- dsenx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
DoubleLine Shiller Enhanced CAPE® Class N
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fcamx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Class A1
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flaax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flgb
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Other Region
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
Expenses: 0.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »
- cdhix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Calvert International Responsible Index Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »