Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$PBRCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vclt
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jitix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
JPMorgan Intermediate Tax Free Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- usig
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- watfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Western Asset Core Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- xlp
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Defensive
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund
Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
- flcb
- ETF
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Franklin Liberty US Core Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- iwn
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Value
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Expenses: 0.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- gwpax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fbltx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Fidelity® SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
Expenses: 0.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »