PAWZ : ProShares Pet Care ETF

PAWZ is a Allocation Market Other with LOW fees.

PAWZ

ProShares Pet Care ETF

FI Score

45 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,674 Allocation Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare PAWZ vs CHYDX

16% FI Score
  • chydx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs PFSRX

16% FI Score
  • pfsrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Newfleet Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs JSVIX

16% FI Score
  • jsvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

James Alpha Structured Credit Value Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs RAGHX

16% FI Score
  • raghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs GWSAX

16% FI Score
  • gwsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Focus Five Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs HEQFX

16% FI Score
  • heqfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Monteagle Opportunity Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs LCDAX

16% FI Score
  • lcdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs CVLFX

16% FI Score
  • cvlfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Cullen Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs IPBCX

16% FI Score
  • ipbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs PWREX

16% FI Score
  • pwrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pioneer Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs NEEGX

16% FI Score
  • neegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Needham Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs KWINX

16% FI Score
  • kwinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Kinetics Alternative Income Fund No Load Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs RYLSX

16% FI Score
  • rylsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Leisure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs ICBMX

16% FI Score
  • icbmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

ICON Natural Resources Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs RYMGX

16% FI Score
  • rymgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs RYTIX

16% FI Score
  • rytix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs OEMCX

16% FI Score
  • oemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs SMSVX

16% FI Score
  • smsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs SNWAX

16% FI Score
  • snwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Snow Capital Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs SREAX

16% FI Score
  • sreax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Select Real Estate Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo