• bemax
• Mutual Fund
• International Stocks
• Emerging Markets

Brandes Emerging Markets Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

• ndvbx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Value

MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• amtcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• difcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

MFS Diversified Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• cbstx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

Columbia Mid Cap Growth Fund Class V

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• eapdx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Parametric Dividend Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• lsst
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• gtcex
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• cbsax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

Columbia Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• erbax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »