• ttac
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

TrimTabs All Cap U.S. Free-Cash-Flow ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• psgcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• rinf
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• rllcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• rndm
• ETF
• International Stocks
• Large Blend

First Trust Developed International Equity Select ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

• rpeax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

Davis Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• rsggx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Victory RS Global Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• scsax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

Wells Fargo Common Stock Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• sdag
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

IQ Short Duration Enhanced Core Bond U.S. ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• smamx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Total US Bond Market

ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »