Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$PALL Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,417 Commodities Focused funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sphd
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- swrsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Schwab® Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund
Expenses: 0.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- viaax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- vustx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- manlx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BlackRock National Municipal Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ambfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- iwo
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jtmix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- sfsnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- oibfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
JPMorgan Investor Balanced Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- oncfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fmfmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity Advisor® Series Equity Growth Fund
Expenses: 0.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mgk
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lihix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2045 Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- aggy
- ETF
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- bbax
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
Expenses: 0.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- bbjp
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Japan Stock
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
Expenses: 0.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- pdbzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund -Class Z
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »