Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$PABCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- phlax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- hflrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gwgix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ggm
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Credit Allocation Fund
Expenses: 2.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gilfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund C-Class
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mdhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- edd
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
Expenses: 3.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- glo
- Mutual Fund
- Other
- Tactical Allocation
Clough Global Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 4.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »
- medcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »