OUSM : O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

OUSM is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with LOW fees.

OUSM

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

1 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OUSM vs JJT

34% FI Score
  • jjt
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Tin Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs NSBTX

34% FI Score
  • nsbtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs NVGBX

34% FI Score
  • nvgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs OBCHX

34% FI Score
  • obchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Oberweis China Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs OKMIX

34% FI Score
  • okmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs JUCIX

34% FI Score
  • jucix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund - I Shares

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs PBNAX

34% FI Score
  • pbnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs NAEFX

34% FI Score
  • naefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs NCHCX

34% FI Score
  • nchcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs MHIBX

34% FI Score
  • mhibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs MHICX

34% FI Score
  • mhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs PCRCX

34% FI Score
  • pcrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs AAAPX

34% FI Score
  • aaapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs AACFX

34% FI Score
  • aacfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Invesco Greater China Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs AAZAX

34% FI Score
  • aazax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Arizona Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ACASX

34% FI Score
  • acasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Access Capital Community Investment Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs AFRCX

34% FI Score
  • afrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs AIRR

34% FI Score
  • airr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs APIUX

34% FI Score
  • apiux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ARLCX

34% FI Score
  • arlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo