Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$ORSTX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- kytfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Dupree Mutual Fund Kentucky Tax-Free Income Fund
Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prbix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
JPMorgan Tax Free Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- utelx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
USAA Tax Exempt Long-Term Fund Adviser Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nvhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhyqx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin High Yield Tax Free Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- coltx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Tax-Exempt Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mfiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
MFS Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tecfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
American Funds Tax-Exempt Fund of California® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
T. Rowe Price California Tax-Free Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »