OPSIX : Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class A

OPSIX is a Bond Market Total US Bond Market with HIGH fees.

OPSIX

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class A

FI Score

49 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OPSIX vs OBOR

31% FI Score
  • obor
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs GCEQX

31% FI Score
  • gceqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs RYTMX

31% FI Score
  • rytmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs MSIBX

31% FI Score
  • msibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs HMVRX

31% FI Score
  • hmvrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs LPEIX

31% FI Score
  • lpeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs WMICX

31% FI Score
  • wmicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Wasatch Micro Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs FSBBX

31% FI Score
  • fsbbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Global Allocation Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs GMCIX

31% FI Score
  • gmcix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

LMCG Global MultiCap Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs SMPIX

31% FI Score
  • smpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs RMBKX

31% FI Score
  • rmbkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs SNIGX

31% FI Score
  • snigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Sit Large Cap Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs MUHLX

30% FI Score
  • muhlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Muhlenkamp Fund

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs SMDD

30% FI Score
  • smdd
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs MWATX

30% FI Score
  • mwatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Metropolitan West AlphaTrak 500 Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs GVCAX

30% FI Score
  • gvcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Value 25 Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs ARFDX

30% FI Score
  • arfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs AREMX

30% FI Score
  • aremx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2055 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs APFDX

30% FI Score
  • apfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Artisan Global Discovery Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPSIX vs MECAX

30% FI Score
  • mecax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AMG Managers Cadence Emerging Companies Fund - Class N

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo