Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$OPPAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- iga
- Mutual Fund
- Other
- Options-based
Voya Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »
- fthi
- ETF
- Other
- Options-based
First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »
- fthnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- thifx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Thornburg Limited Term Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fumb
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iigd
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gilpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund Class P
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iyk
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Defensive
iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF
Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jrstx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Janus Henderson U.S. Managed Volatility Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »