Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$OPGIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gmaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jgvax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Global Value Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jogex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JOHCM Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rgoix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RBC Global Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wwoix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ieacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AIG Income Explorer Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mctrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Income Builder Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ggscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- arsox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aristotle/Saul Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »