ONEV : SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF

ONEV is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with LOW fees.

ONEV

SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF

FI Score

68 /100

Diversification Rating

5 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ONEV vs DMBCX

25% FI Score
  • dmbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs MHWIX

25% FI Score
  • mhwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Strategic Global Bond Fund, Inc. Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs DLLDX

25% FI Score
  • dlldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs MGHIX

25% FI Score
  • mghix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs THNDX

25% FI Score
  • thndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund Class D

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs SZEIX

25% FI Score
  • szeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs MEAIX

25% FI Score
  • meaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Fixed Income Opportunities Portfolio I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs BAREX

25% FI Score
  • barex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

BlackRock Real Estate Securities Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs AGIAX

25% FI Score
  • agiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs KGRN

24% FI Score
  • kgrn
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

KraneShares MSCI China Environment Index ETF

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs LCNOX

24% FI Score
  • lcnox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Lazard International Equity Concentrated Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs DGBCX

24% FI Score
  • dgbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs STMMX

24% FI Score
  • stmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs CPER

24% FI Score
  • cper
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

United States Copper Index Fund, LP

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs GSICX

24% FI Score
  • gsicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs DDICX

24% FI Score
  • ddicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Delaware Wealth Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs COICX

24% FI Score
  • coicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Calvert International Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs COBYX

24% FI Score
  • cobyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

The Cook & Bynum Fund

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs AFIF

24% FI Score
  • afif
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ONEV vs EHIAX

24% FI Score
  • ehiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Eaton Vance Hexavest International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo