Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$OLVCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fdsbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AIG Focused Dividend Strategy Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- brudx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- twqax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Transamerica Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- cblsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- aeyix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Equity Income Fund C Class
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tdfix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Transamerica Dividend Focused Class I
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- balvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BMO Large-Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- idhix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Integrity Dividend Harvest Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- suvzx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM QMA Large-Cap Value Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »