Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$OIPAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- taclx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Touchstone Large Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- srvex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Victory Diversified Stock Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gilix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund Institutional
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- pwbax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dlcex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Dana Large Cap Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dhtax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Diamond Hill All Cap Select Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- nmucx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- nfacx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Neuberger Berman Focus Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mxccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Federated Max-Cap Index Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »