• mulsx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternative
• Short

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Ultra-Short Income Portfolio Class IR

Expenses: 0.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

• dsi
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• prilx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Parnassus Core Equity Fund - Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• prfz
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• prdgx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• shyg
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• sscjx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• sssvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

State Street Equity 500 Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• ustex
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

USAA Tax Exempt Long-Term Fund

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• xlu
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Utilities

Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund

Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »