Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$OFICX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- iobax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ICON Flexible Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mcwix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock Strategic Global Bond Fund, Inc. Investor C1 Shares
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ekhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pghyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tmayx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Touchstone Credit Opportunities II Fund Y
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- anhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dblnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DoubleLine Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- stsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecdax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »