OCGCX : JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth Fund Class C

OCGCX is a Allocation Market All-In-One with HIGH fees.

OCGCX

JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth Fund Class C

FI Score

49 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OCGCX vs FID

42% FI Score
  • fid
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs FJPNX

42% FI Score
  • fjpnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Fidelity® Japan Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs FLBL

42% FI Score
  • flbl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs FNGO

42% FI Score
  • fngo
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs FRFZX

42% FI Score
  • frfzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs FRUSX

42% FI Score
  • frusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Franklin Utilities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs FSHCX

42% FI Score
  • fshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Fidelity® Select Health Care Services Portfolio

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs FSTCX

42% FI Score
  • fstcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Fidelity® Select Telecommunications Portfolio

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs FTXH

42% FI Score
  • ftxh
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs FXR

42% FI Score
  • fxr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs GCSAX

42% FI Score
  • gcsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs GEGCX

42% FI Score
  • gegcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Aberdeen Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs GERAX

42% FI Score
  • gerax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs GMZ

42% FI Score
  • gmz
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Goldman Sachs MLP Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs LIDAX

42% FI Score
  • lidax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Lord Abbett International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs GSAOX

42% FI Score
  • gsaox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs GSPQX

42% FI Score
  • gspqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs GUDB

42% FI Score
  • gudb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Sage ESG Intermediate Credit ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs HISGX

42% FI Score
  • hisgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCGCX vs HLMRX

42% FI Score
  • hlmrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio Institutional

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo