OCACX : Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class C

OCACX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with HIGH fees.

OCACX

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class C

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OCACX vs WWWEX

17% FI Score
  • wwwex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Kinetics Global No Load Class

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs BUYIX

17% FI Score
  • buyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Catalyst Buyback Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs JVSIX

17% FI Score
  • jvsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs DHIVX

17% FI Score
  • dhivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Centre Global Infrastructure Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs LPJCX

17% FI Score
  • lpjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath<sup>&reg;</sup> Dynamic 2035 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs ECHAX

17% FI Score
  • echax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs EGWCX

17% FI Score
  • egwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Wells Fargo Fundamental Small Cap Growth Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs EISAX

17% FI Score
  • eisax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs BCMTX

17% FI Score
  • bcmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Sterling Capital Strategic Allocation Growth Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs DLMCX

17% FI Score
  • dlmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Delaware Mid Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs GLBIX

17% FI Score
  • glbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Leuthold Global Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs ALSIX

17% FI Score
  • alsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AMG River Road Long-Short Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs FRTCX

17% FI Score
  • frtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ Retirement Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs HGDAX

17% FI Score
  • hgdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AAM/HIMCO Global Enhanced Dividend Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs GRU

17% FI Score
  • gru
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the MLCX Grains Index - Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs HEOCX

17% FI Score
  • heocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Highland Long/Short Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 3.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs EUFX

17% FI Score
  • eufx
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short Euro

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs LOGSX

17% FI Score
  • logsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Live Oak Health Sciences Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs LONGX

17% FI Score
  • longx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Longboard Alternative Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs MOM

17% FI Score
  • mom
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AGFiQ U.S. Market Neutral Momentum Fund

Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo