OCACX : Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class C

OCACX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with HIGH fees.

OCACX

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class C

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OCACX vs CVISX

22% FI Score
  • cvisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Causeway International Small Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs CVLCX

22% FI Score
  • cvlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs SREZX

22% FI Score
  • srezx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Select Real Estate Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs SUHAX

22% FI Score
  • suhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs FTTCX

22% FI Score
  • fttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2025 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs DSGDX

22% FI Score
  • dsgdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Delaware Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs DURAX

22% FI Score
  • durax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS ESG International Core Equity Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs ECHSX

22% FI Score
  • echsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs EQCHX

22% FI Score
  • eqchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs EWECX

22% FI Score
  • ewecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs FAUS

22% FI Score
  • faus
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs FTRCX

22% FI Score
  • ftrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2035 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs FVALX

22% FI Score
  • fvalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Forester Value Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs GOPAX

22% FI Score
  • gopax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Aberdeen China A Share Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs GURPX

22% FI Score
  • gurpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs HCMAX

22% FI Score
  • hcmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Hillman Value Fund No Load Shares

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs HPEAX

22% FI Score
  • hpeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Highland Socially Responsible Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs PJGCX

22% FI Score
  • pjgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs PLBEX

22% FI Score
  • plbex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Plumb Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs PLBBX

22% FI Score
  • plbbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Plumb Balanced Fund

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo