OAKBX : Oakmark Equity And Income Fund Investor Class

OAKBX is a Allocation Market All-In-One with MODERATE fees.

OAKBX

Oakmark Equity And Income Fund Investor Class

FI Score

59 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OAKBX vs KHYCX

27% FI Score
  • khycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DWS High Income Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs KTCCX

27% FI Score
  • ktccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

DWS Science and Technology Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs LDMAX

27% FI Score
  • ldmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs PNRCX

27% FI Score
  • pnrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs RYACX

27% FI Score
  • ryacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs RYAFX

27% FI Score
  • ryafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs RYSHX

27% FI Score
  • ryshx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs SCAP

27% FI Score
  • scap
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

AdvisorShares Cornerstone Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs SCMVX

27% FI Score
  • scmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Schneider Small Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs SRMCX

27% FI Score
  • srmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs TCPCX

27% FI Score
  • tcpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Touchstone Impact Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs TEEAX

27% FI Score
  • teeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

RBC Small Cap Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs THNMX

27% FI Score
  • thnmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs TSSCX

27% FI Score
  • tsscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Thornburg Strategic Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs TVOAX

27% FI Score
  • tvoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Touchstone Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs UAPIX

27% FI Score
  • uapix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs WASMX

27% FI Score
  • wasmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Walden SMID Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs VNVCX

27% FI Score
  • vnvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Value Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs VQT

27% FI Score
  • vqt
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Barclays ETN+ S&P VEQTOR ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OAKBX vs VSLCX

27% FI Score
  • vslcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo