Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$NWJSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mqlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Limited Maturity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jphax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dfrtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Floating Rate Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Symphony Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- amhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eshix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- evfhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mxfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ebnex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class F-1
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »