Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$NWJSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tflax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mcrdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Matthews Asia Credit Opportunities Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pglbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Global Income Trust Class B
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bmhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BMO High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- szeax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fehcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Eagle High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tphix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tmarx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Touchstone Credit Opportunities II Fund A
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »