Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$NVAFX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sgol
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
Aberdeen Standard Gold ETF Trust
Expenses: 0.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- pggax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ssbrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fgomx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
Expenses: 0.31% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- fssfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Fidelity Advisor® Series Small Cap Fund
Expenses: 0.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- iwy
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- livix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2055 Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- vgsix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.26% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- blpfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- gaifx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mnilx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Litman Gregory Masters International Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- magwx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MFS Growth Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mdskx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jdesx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jsmsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2030 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- sfnnx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- ssbwx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- jpiex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class L
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »