NUSC : Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF

NUSC is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with LOW fees.

NUSC

Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF

FI Score

60 /100

Diversification Rating

6 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NUSC vs GATMX

39% FI Score
  • gatmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Tax-Managed Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs IOFCX

39% FI Score
  • iofcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs IPAY

39% FI Score
  • ipay
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs GLVAX

39% FI Score
  • glvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs JHB

39% FI Score
  • jhb
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen High Income November 2021 Target Term Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs JPT

39% FI Score
  • jpt
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Preferred and Income 2022 Term Fund

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs LABD

39% FI Score
  • labd
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs QGRCX

39% FI Score
  • qgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs POEYX

39% FI Score
  • poeyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Principal Origin Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs SBAPX

39% FI Score
  • sbapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Segall Bryant & Hamill Short Term Plus Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs SNOIX

39% FI Score
  • snoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs SWHCX

39% FI Score
  • swhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Principal Strategic Asset Management Strategic Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs STABX

39% FI Score
  • stabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Short Term Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs TCPAX

39% FI Score
  • tcpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Touchstone Impact Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs TCWAX

39% FI Score
  • tcwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Templeton China World Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs TTRCX

39% FI Score
  • ttrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Templeton Global Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs TYHYX

39% FI Score
  • tyhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer High Yield Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs PPVCX

39% FI Score
  • ppvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds Preservation Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs THDAX

39% FI Score
  • thdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Thornburg Developing World Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUSC vs PORTX

39% FI Score
  • portx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo