Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$NSVCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- armzx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- nqccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Nuveen NWQ Large Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- rydax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pass
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bear 3XShrs
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- pudcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pwdcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Power Dividend Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- casax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Asia/Pacific Stock
Columbia Pacific/Asia Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- caxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mfmpx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Frontier Markets Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »