Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$NSGCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- acsqx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century Short Duration Fund A Class
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- adaix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Neutral
AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »
- adblx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
AMG Managers DoubleLine Core Plus Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- pcgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- afrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- alczx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Alger International Focus Fund Class Z
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- nitfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Aquila Narragansett Tax-Free Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- arbix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Neutral
Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »
- atecx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »