Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$NSCAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 310 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sksex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AMG Managers Skyline Special Equities Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rspyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Victory RS Partners Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- oscnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vvpsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap Fund
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- iysax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Ivy Small Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- qsslx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AQR TM Small Cap Multi-Style Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lzscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- cdofx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- szcax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
DWS Small Cap Core Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »