NSBCX : Nuveen Santa Barbara Dividend Growth Fund Class C

NSBCX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

NSBCX

Nuveen Santa Barbara Dividend Growth Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NSBCX vs MCIYX

49% FI Score
  • mciyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BMO Corporate Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs DBULX

49% FI Score
  • dbulx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

DoubleLine Ultra Short Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs MCGWX

49% FI Score
  • mcgwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs FHCDX

49% FI Score
  • fhcdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2060 Fund Class K6

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs DEW

49% FI Score
  • dew
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs DWGFX

49% FI Score
  • dwgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund Class F-1

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs PEAFX

49% FI Score
  • peafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs SIGVX

49% FI Score
  • sigvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Virtus Seix U.S. Government Securities Ultra-Short Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs PSRAX

49% FI Score
  • psrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pioneer Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs ISEM

49% FI Score
  • isem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco RAFI Strategic Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs RTM

49% FI Score
  • rtm
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs IFACX

49% FI Score
  • ifacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Funds The Income Fund of America® Class C

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs AIMCX

49% FI Score
  • aimcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Intermediate Diversified Municipal Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs CAF

49% FI Score
  • caf
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs FCTLX

49% FI Score
  • fctlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Franklin Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs DDM

49% FI Score
  • ddm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs USTB

49% FI Score
  • ustb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VictoryShares USAA Core Short-Term Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs NUSA

49% FI Score
  • nusa
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs FHQRX

49% FI Score
  • fhqrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NSBCX vs INDS

49% FI Score
  • inds
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo