Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$NRFAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- susa
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vlue
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- faptx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Fund® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fdssx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity® Stock Selector All Cap Fund
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- aiahx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
American Century Inflation Adjusted Bond Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flot
- ETF
- Alternative
- Short
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- jalbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jqua
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- maagx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »