Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$NOICX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sreax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
PGIM Select Real Estate Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- flcgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Meeder Quantex Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- flotx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Power Floating Rate Index Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- suhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class C
Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- icmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Intrepid Disciplined Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- frfdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Floating Rate II Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flskx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Franklin LifeSmart⢠2050 Retirement Target Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- tndcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2040 Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fcef
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
Expenses: 3.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »