NOBOX : Northern Bond Index Fund

NOBOX is a Bond Market Total US Bond Market index fund with LOW fees.

NOBOX

Northern Bond Index Fund

FI Score

85 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NOBOX vs PSECX

11% FI Score
  • psecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

1789 Growth and Income Fund Class Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs MCLAX

11% FI Score
  • mclax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs RYIYX

11% FI Score
  • ryiyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse High Yield Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs APIGX

11% FI Score
  • apigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Capital Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs ARYTX

11% FI Score
  • arytx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

American Century Global Real Estate Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs LHCAX

11% FI Score
  • lhcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Lord Abbett Health Care Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs ACEMX

11% FI Score
  • acemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Alger Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs HSZYX

11% FI Score
  • hszyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Highland Small-Cap Equity Fund Class Y

Expenses: 2.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs COMVX

11% FI Score
  • comvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Comstock Capital Value Fund AAA Class

Expenses: 3.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs ECHCX

11% FI Score
  • echcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs ECSEX

11% FI Score
  • ecsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eaton Vance Special Equities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs IOLCX

11% FI Score
  • iolcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

ICON Long/Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs CTVAX

11% FI Score
  • ctvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Catalyst Small Cap Insider Buying Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs TRIFX

11% FI Score
  • trifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs PFACX

11% FI Score
  • pfacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs AMRCX

11% FI Score
  • amrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Growth Fund Series One Class C

Expenses: 6.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs AMRAX

11% FI Score
  • amrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Growth Fund Series One Class A

Expenses: 5.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs RYBIX

10% FI Score
  • rybix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Rydex Basic Materials Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs GSYCX

10% FI Score
  • gsycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Imprint Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBOX vs BUYCX

10% FI Score
  • buycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Catalyst Buyback Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo