NOBL : ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

NOBL is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

FI Score

79 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NOBL vs PDECX

13% FI Score
  • pdecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund- Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs ABLCX

13% FI Score
  • ablcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs ACVVX

13% FI Score
  • acvvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 3.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs AEQAX

13% FI Score
  • aeqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Ascendant Deep Value Bond Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs AFAAX

13% FI Score
  • afaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Capital Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs AGFQX

13% FI Score
  • agfqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Global Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs AGMAX

13% FI Score
  • agmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianzGI Emerging Markets SRI Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs APJAX

13% FI Score
  • apjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Aberdeen Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs APMAX

13% FI Score
  • apmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Master Allocation Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs ARMAX

13% FI Score
  • armax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

AllianzGI Global Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs AVSAX

13% FI Score
  • avsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs ORLCX

13% FI Score
  • orlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

North Square Multi Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs LD

13% FI Score
  • ld
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Bloomberg Lead Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs CANE

13% FI Score
  • cane
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

Teucrium Sugar

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs ABRSX

13% FI Score
  • abrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ABR Dynamic Short Volatility Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs CFHIX

13% FI Score
  • cfhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Catalyst Hedged Commodity Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs CNJFX

13% FI Score
  • cnjfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Commonwealth Japan Fund

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs CYB

13% FI Score
  • cyb
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • Single Currency

WisdomTree Chinese Yuan Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Single Currency Money Market fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs RYSIX

13% FI Score
  • rysix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Electronics Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs VIRCX

13% FI Score
  • vircx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement Now Fund Class CX

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo