NOBL : ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

NOBL is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

FI Score

79 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NOBL vs PGTDX

25% FI Score
  • pgtdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Putnam Global Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs MGBDX

25% FI Score
  • mgbdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Global Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs MBACX

25% FI Score
  • mbacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs ACSKX

25% FI Score
  • acskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century Short Duration Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs ACVUX

25% FI Score
  • acvux
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century International Value Fund I Class

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs AGEPX

25% FI Score
  • agepx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Beacon Frontier Markets Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs AGSAX

25% FI Score
  • agsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AB Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PCAIX

24% FI Score
  • pcaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PGIM California Muni Income Fund-Class B

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs BIZD

24% FI Score
  • bizd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF

Expenses: 9.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs BXGYX

24% FI Score
  • bxgyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Global High Yield Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs CAEAX

24% FI Score
  • caeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Columbia Acorn European Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PFSAX

24% FI Score
  • pfsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PFSMX

24% FI Score
  • pfsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PGGIX

24% FI Score
  • pggix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Global Income Trust Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PJRCX

24% FI Score
  • pjrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA International Equity Fund- Class C

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs CIHCX

24% FI Score
  • cihcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Cullen International High Dividend Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs COBYX

24% FI Score
  • cobyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

The Cook & Bynum Fund

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs COICX

24% FI Score
  • coicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Calvert International Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs CPER

24% FI Score
  • cper
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

United States Copper Index Fund, LP

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PYICX

24% FI Score
  • pyicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo