NOBL : ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

NOBL is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

FI Score

79 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NOBL vs FTGC

29% FI Score
  • ftgc
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs FSAHX

29% FI Score
  • fsahx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Fidelity® Short Duration High Income Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs FFGCX

29% FI Score
  • ffgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Fidelity® Global Commodity Stock Fund

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs FPXE

29% FI Score
  • fpxe
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

First Trust IPOX Europe Equity Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs FNGD

29% FI Score
  • fngd
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

MicroSectors FANG+ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs FIXRX

29% FI Score
  • fixrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs NGE

29% FI Score
  • nge
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Global X MSCI Nigeria ETF

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs JPHCX

29% FI Score
  • jphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs SDCI

29% FI Score
  • sdci
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs NELCX

29% FI Score
  • nelcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Nuveen Equity Long/Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 3.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs GSZCX

29% FI Score
  • gszcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs EWEAX

29% FI Score
  • eweax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs TPAIX

29% FI Score
  • tpaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Timothy Plan Israel Common Values Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs EUGAX

29% FI Score
  • eugax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity Fund Inc. Class A

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs NCRCX

29% FI Score
  • ncrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs HNCRX

29% FI Score
  • hncrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Hartford International Growth Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PROTX

29% FI Score
  • protx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Probabilities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs SCSSX

29% FI Score
  • scssx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs GTALX

29% FI Score
  • gtalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2035 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs NCDCX

29% FI Score
  • ncdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo