NOBL : ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

NOBL is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

FI Score

79 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NOBL vs PRDCX

42% FI Score
  • prdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs AHTCX

42% FI Score
  • ahtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class C

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs FAZ

42% FI Score
  • faz
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PUREX

42% FI Score
  • purex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Global Real Estate Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PUCAX

42% FI Score
  • pucax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PGIM Strategic Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs PSSCX

42% FI Score
  • psscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

PIMCO StocksPLUS® Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs MFWCX

42% FI Score
  • mfwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs MEQFX

42% FI Score
  • meqfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AMG FQ Long-Short Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs NSTCX

42% FI Score
  • nstcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs MFWBX

42% FI Score
  • mfwbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Total Return Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs QLENX

42% FI Score
  • qlenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N

Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs RRFIX

42% FI Score
  • rrfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Real Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs NTBAX

42% FI Score
  • ntbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Navigator Tactical Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs IBOAX

42% FI Score
  • iboax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Ivy Securian Core Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs GSCAX

42% FI Score
  • gscax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs MWCRX

42% FI Score
  • mwcrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Unconstrained Bond Fund Class M

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs MWECX

42% FI Score
  • mwecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs MWFEX

42% FI Score
  • mwfex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Metropolitan West Flexible Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs NDCRX

42% FI Score
  • ndcrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced Class C

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NOBL vs NBICX

42% FI Score
  • nbicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Aggressive Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo