Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$NNGAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fstux
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco Dividend Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ofvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
O'Shaughnessy Market Leaders Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hdgrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lcevx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco Diversified Dividend Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- yafix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ldfvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- iautx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco Dividend Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lbscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dagvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lbwix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- alvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Large Company Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- peqnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Putnam Equity Income Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- eqrr
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- spdv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- leisx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- indzx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Columbia Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- peqcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Putnam Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- baeix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bmiix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BNY Mellon Income Stock Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »