Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$NMGAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- alsix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
AMG River Road Long-Short Fund Class I
Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- ddjrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DDJ Opportunistic High Yield Fund Class II
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- armzx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- dfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Floating Rate Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- concx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia U.S. Social Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhivx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Global Equity
Centre Global Infrastructure Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »
- longx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Longboard Alternative Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- echax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- garbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guinness Atkinson Renminbi Yuan & Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bcmtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Sterling Capital Strategic Allocation Growth Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- gllax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- frtcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Franklin LifeSmart⢠Retirement Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- dvftx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Delaware Tax-Free California Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pudcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- icmbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Intrepid Capital Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dacfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- iixax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxeax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Emerging Markets Debt Blended Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »