Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
AllianzGI Global Small-Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Lazard Real Assets and Pricing Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Thrivent Low Volatility Equity Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Lazard Global Equity Select Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Nationwide Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Brandes Global Equity Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map