Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$NGCAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- oniax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- oneo
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lisax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prgix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
T. Rowe Price Growth and Income Fund
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ptbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- sopyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- stbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Short Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cbfsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smtax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2040 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »