Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$NFFCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- amhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- laoix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Macro Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Symphony Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sitex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class F
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dfrtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Floating Rate Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwcbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Corporate Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pubcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hflcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agivx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »