Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$NERCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- irbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ivy Pictet Targeted Return Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dnfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lmyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- anhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dblnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DoubleLine Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- stsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iobax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ICON Flexible Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agmix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AllianzGI Emerging Markets SRI Debt Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ekhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »