Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$NERAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- iecax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ivy Pictet Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sihsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- icsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Short Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eeidx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rbesx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hahcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wavlx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pkbix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund SI Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »