NEOMX : Neiman Opportunities Fund Class A

NEOMX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

NEOMX

Neiman Opportunities Fund Class A

FI Score

13 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NEOMX vs FGILX

31% FI Score
  • fgilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Fidelity® Global Equity Income Fund

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs AEDVX

31% FI Score
  • aedvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century Emerging Markets Debt Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs CFIPX

31% FI Score
  • cfipx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

QS Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs OBOR

31% FI Score
  • obor
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs GGGAX

31% FI Score
  • gggax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs LROAX

31% FI Score
  • lroax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs GDG

31% FI Score
  • gdg
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Gadsden Dynamic Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs ECSIX

31% FI Score
  • ecsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs BJK

31% FI Score
  • bjk
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs PSFIX

31% FI Score
  • psfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Newfleet Senior Floating Rate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs PUDAX

31% FI Score
  • pudax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs BWVAX

31% FI Score
  • bwvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital West Virginia Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs MGBAX

31% FI Score
  • mgbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Global Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs ECEMX

31% FI Score
  • ecemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Parametric Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs TGPNX

31% FI Score
  • tgpnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

TCW Conservative Allocation Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs MMUBX

31% FI Score
  • mmubx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

MFS Utilities Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs MMUCX

31% FI Score
  • mmucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

MFS Utilities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs MRLBX

31% FI Score
  • mrlbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Real Estate Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs LTUSX

31% FI Score
  • ltusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NEOMX vs TGMEX

31% FI Score
  • tgmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

TCW Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Opportunities Fund N Share Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo