Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$NEHYX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rphyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund Class Retail
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tahyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phybx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pshcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Short Term Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jecsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Strategic Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pelcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pyfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden Floating Rate Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dibax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- frfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund- Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »