Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$NEFRX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dwafx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Arrow DWA Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ryazx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryrrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hhccx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Highland Healthcare Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- flrqx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Franklin LifeSmart⢠2020 Retirement Target Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- hroax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Fintrust Income and Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- htacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Highland Total Return Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- inscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- iocax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
ICON Risk-Managed Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »