NEFHX : Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A

NEFHX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

NEFHX

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A

FI Score

21 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NEFHX vs GABAX

43% FI Score
  • gabax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Gabelli Asset Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs IRBO

43% FI Score
  • irbo
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs IPOAX

43% FI Score
  • ipoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Ivy Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs GCICX

43% FI Score
  • gcicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs GICCX

43% FI Score
  • giccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs GIEZX

43% FI Score
  • giezx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs UOPIX

43% FI Score
  • uopix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs JCLCX

43% FI Score
  • jclcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs JDD

43% FI Score
  • jdd
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Diversified Dividend and Income Fund

Expenses: 2.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs JDSCX

43% FI Score
  • jdscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs JHCS

43% FI Score
  • jhcs
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

John Hancock Multifactor Media and Communications ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs USBSX

43% FI Score
  • usbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

USAA Cornerstone Moderate Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs KBWR

43% FI Score
  • kbwr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs MVCCX

43% FI Score
  • mvccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs AAAGX

43% FI Score
  • aaagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs MSIIX

43% FI Score
  • msiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MainStay MacKay International Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs ABLAX

43% FI Score
  • ablax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs MSQLX

43% FI Score
  • msqlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs ACGGX

43% FI Score
  • acggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

American Century Global Gold Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NEFHX vs MTPKX

43% FI Score
  • mtpkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2030 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo