Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$NECCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lbhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Thrivent High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lgmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fkrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jblmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio Class B
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ltuix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gsfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Goldman Sachs Bond Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- hglb
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Highland Global Allocation Fund
Expenses: 2.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mbapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mcsmx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- China Stock
Matthews China Small Companies Fund
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »