Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$NBSSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dsefx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Domini Impact Equity Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- pcotx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Pioneer Core Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- omsnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street All Cap Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- grmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- matix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MainStay Epoch U.S. All Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- psocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
PIMCO StocksPLUS® Absolute Return Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- scscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Touchstone Large Cap Focused Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- nlacx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Nuveen Large Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- eivax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Wells Fargo Classic Value Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »