NBSSX : Neuberger Berman Focus Fund Investor Class

NBSSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

NBSSX

Neuberger Berman Focus Fund Investor Class

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NBSSX vs RTM

49% FI Score
  • rtm
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs VMINX

49% FI Score
  • vminx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Municipal Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs USTB

49% FI Score
  • ustb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VictoryShares USAA Core Short-Term Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs OSMNX

49% FI Score
  • osmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Small-Mid Company Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs MMIGX

49% FI Score
  • mmigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal Income Fund Class B1

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs EWZS

49% FI Score
  • ewzs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs DFP

49% FI Score
  • dfp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Preferred Stock

Flaherty & Crumrine Dynamic Preferred and Income Fund

Expenses: 2.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs OIDCX

49% FI Score
  • oidcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Diversified Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs OPSIX

49% FI Score
  • opsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs MMACX

49% FI Score
  • mmacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Moderate Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs MMABX

49% FI Score
  • mmabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Moderate Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs ISEM

49% FI Score
  • isem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco RAFI Strategic Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs FSEAX

49% FI Score
  • fseax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Fidelity® Emerging Asia Fund

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs HFYSX

49% FI Score
  • hfysx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs MTKIX

49% FI Score
  • mtkix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2060 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs DEW

49% FI Score
  • dew
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs FHQRX

49% FI Score
  • fhqrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs BSCT

49% FI Score
  • bsct
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs RYF

49% FI Score
  • ryf
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs BSJO

49% FI Score
  • bsjo
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo